Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Donohue: Over the line?
dotCommonweal ^ | David Gibson

Posted on 05/03/2008 6:58:15 PM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 541-549 next last
To: Judith Anne

The March of the Catholic-Hating Fetishists stomps on into the night.


421 posted on 05/09/2008 10:42:51 PM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Religion Moderator; All
I wonder if that's what is bothering our protestant friends, that Catholics have caucus threads where their insults, mocking, denigrating are not allowed...

I've never heard of any complaint by a Protestant that there are caucus threads by any group.

According to the RF rules, caucus threads do not invoke other religions, but simply discuss their own as if one were in a church.

An excellent rule which then permits deeper discussion of theological perspectives on the open forum.

422 posted on 05/09/2008 10:43:08 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

Comment #423 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Eckleburg

On the other hand, “respectful dialogue” is a diabolical fascist plot.


424 posted on 05/09/2008 10:44:10 PM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
Ah yes, the good old days.
425 posted on 05/09/2008 10:45:21 PM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

Comment #426 Removed by Moderator

To: Petronski; Quix; Alex Murphy; 1000 silverlings; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; HarleyD; wmfights; ...
DR.E: IMO Catholicism deifies Mary by calling her a "co-redeemer."

PETRONSKI: You are wrong, as has been demonstrated dozens of times. You do not get to decide what we believe. We do.

For the record...

I do not believe Petronski believes Catholicism deifies Mary. His evidence for this belief has been fairly thin so far, but he's entitled to believe whatever he wants.

Also for the record...

I do believe Catholicism deifies Mary because Catholicism considers Mary to be a "co-redeemer" and a "dispensatrix of all grace," which is in direct opposition to the evidence found in God's holy word which states...

"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" -- 1 Timothy 2:5

427 posted on 05/09/2008 10:51:48 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Do you have an example of any of that, or is it just more hot air?


428 posted on 05/09/2008 10:53:34 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

If all disagreement is seen as a lie and worthy only of silencing, then what point is there is a religion forum?


429 posted on 05/09/2008 10:56:32 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Do you have an example of any of that, or is it just more hot air?

lol. If someone has to read this thread to you, then I'm sorry. You'll have to find someone else.

430 posted on 05/09/2008 10:58:15 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Since learning what a caucus thread is, I tend to avoid catholic caucus threads.

BTW, a catholic caucus thread basically has a big "NO PROTESTANTS ALLOWED" sign. ;)
(caucus threads are CLOSED treads)

The catholics can post as many caucus threads as they like.

Why should they complain about non-catholics posting non-caucus threads?

We let them have their closed threads, and we let them post on our discussion threads.


Somebody needs to grow up.
431 posted on 05/09/2008 11:00:41 PM PDT by Fichori (FreeRepublic.com: Watch your step!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

Comment #432 Removed by Moderator

To: Judith Anne
Again, all disagreement with Rome is seen by many Catholics as "ridicule."

It's a Catch 22, but thankfully, the rules of civil discourse provide for disagreement.

433 posted on 05/09/2008 11:00:55 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Your repetition of the “Catholics deify Mary” charge is a red herring.

How about saving that for an appropriate thread and getting back on track?


434 posted on 05/09/2008 11:01:50 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
lol. If someone has to read this thread to you, then I'm sorry. You'll have to find someone else.

So, you don't have any examples of it. Because there are none.

435 posted on 05/09/2008 11:04:02 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; Quix; Alex Murphy; 1000 silverlings; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
Again, you define "discussing the issues" as falsely telling us what we do or do not believe.

You know, I should just have cards printed and hand them out to you.

I'M NOT TELLING YOU WHAT YOU BELIEVE. I'M TELLING YOU WHAT I BELIEVE ABOUT YOUR BELIEFS, AND WHY I BELIEVE THEY ARE WRONG AND MINE ARE SCRIPTURAL. YOU'RE FREE TO SHOW ME WHERE I'M WRONG ACCORDING TO GOD'S WORD. IF AND WHEN YOU DO, I'LL BE WAITING.

436 posted on 05/09/2008 11:04:52 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

Comment #437 Removed by Moderator

To: Judith Anne

No, but it’s apparently a problem for you.


438 posted on 05/09/2008 11:06:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
But I suspect when you picked it out you were, of course, trying to be crude. :-)

No, I wasn't, and I certainly wasn't trying to be insulting to anyone.

439 posted on 05/09/2008 11:07:19 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

AMEN to every word. Maybe some of them get paid to be here. It sure feels like it.


440 posted on 05/09/2008 11:07:48 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 541-549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson