[papertyger]

. . . regardless of the reasons for doing so

Such as being correct?

[Quix]

Actually, IIRC, the research is fairly clear . . .

that RELIGIOUS affinities, allegiances, choices

have . . . overtly . . . nothing to do

with any objective criteria over rightness or wrongness of a set of dogma . . .

instead, they virtually always have to do with relational/emotional/psychodynamic motivations for change.

I’m fairly confident that all the ‘changers’ both directions have a lot of confirmation of that

if and when

they are

able

and

willing

to face

such facts.