Such as being correct?
Actually, IIRC, the research is fairly clear . . .
that RELIGIOUS affinities, allegiances, choices
have . . . overtly . . . nothing to do
with any objective criteria over rightness or wrongness of a set of dogma . . .
instead, they virtually always have to do with relational/emotional/psychodynamic motivations for change.
I’m fairly confident that all the ‘changers’ both directions have a lot of confirmation of that
if and when
they are
able
and
willing
to face
such facts.