[SoothingDave]

What is wrong with me? Look at the title of this thread, 'sola scriptura' and your refusal to accept this belief because there is no specific verse (even though the principle is indeed strongly alluded to in I Cor. 4:6; Col. 2:8; II Tim. 3:16-17). You go on a complete witch hunt bashing protestants and cry foul when someone else points out to you that some of your doctrines are not specifically found either. That's what's wrong with me!

So you're mad that your basic operating promise is never clearly spelled out in Scripture?

And you're mad that we aren't held to the same rules of sola scriptura because we don't adhere to that notion?

Is that about it?

[conservativegramma]

Ummm, sola scriptura is more spelled out than the sinlessness of Mary is.

And if you don’t ‘adhere to that notion’ (sola scriptura) why get so mad if somebody else ‘adds’ to Scripture then as Petronski keeps claiming? I would think that would be ‘allowed’ in your viewpoint.

Or is it only RCC traditions and additions that are ‘allowed’?