To: Petronski
I'm going to try and cut down these exchanges with you. They are empty calories.
Recall YOUR POST #652 HERE.
"PETRONSKI: I was very pleased to see you admit that you think the pope is the antichrist."
I "admitted" no such thing. As I've said four times now, I find nothing in the WCF to disagree with.
And unlike Rome, I and the WCF have supported our beliefs with Scripture.
1,680 posted on
05/07/2008 12:24:19 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
I "admitted" no such thing. As I've said four times now, I find nothing in the WCF to disagree with.Then you do not disagree with its claim that the Pope is the antichrist. Is "not disagreeing" the same as "agreeing?" Do you not want to say?
1,684 posted on
05/07/2008 12:30:17 PM PDT by
Petronski
(When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
I find nothing in the WCF to disagree with.There is only agree and disagree, right?
Did Cauvin or Machen invent something new for you?
1,688 posted on
05/07/2008 12:34:10 PM PDT by
Petronski
(When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Amazing that you say you find nothing in the WCF you disagree with, yet you object when I suggest you believe this: “Nor can the Pope of Rome, in any sense, be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and son of perdition, that exalts himself, in the Church, against Christ and all that is called God.[14]” which is from the WCF.
If I believed that, I’d be ashamed of it too.
1,716 posted on
05/07/2008 2:43:59 PM PDT by
Petronski
(When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson