Sure looks like the object of worship is Mary.shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua
Posted on 05/03/2008 4:38:34 PM PDT by NYer
I find nothing, as I have stated. I trust that God's Word is true. It is you that 'finds' innocence in youth, within the confines of your own knowledge, and of your own judgment, making exceptions where none exist, and gainsaying the clear word of Scripture. That is a caution.
You are welcome to prove your point upon the Word, at which time I will happily cede my position. But until I see it in the Holy Texts, I can do nothing other than stand firm.
Bless (Praise) the Holy NAME of G-d !
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua
( (peace(rest) in the Holy NAME of Yah'shua( Jesus))
Then perhaps in light of First Corinthians 11:26-30 and explain how exactly one can be “unworthy” of a mere “symbol”? How can you be “guilty” of the Body and Blood of the Lord if there is no Real Presence?
Pssst! Hey! You're not supposed to tell 'em that until after they've signed over their assets.
Darn, the cat's out of the bag! Priests are directed to turn their backs on the objects of our idolatry and wehen we say,"Don't pray TO statues," what we mean is, "Go ahead, and if you have a goat, why not sacrifice it -- couldn't hurt."
Sure looks like the object of worship is Mary.shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua
I'm prepared to be edumicated.
After looking at the pictures of the beautiful church, and it is beautiful, something ocurred to me...
If a large group of Catholics became stranded on an island, or were forced into the ‘wilderness’ somehow, how would you be able to worship???
Would your religion fall apart until you were able to build a church and collect all of it’s aids to worship???
So was Judas. So was Herod. So was the Roman soldier with the spear. [...]
A good point.
Really though, instead of having something so large that you can only us it at your mountain top monk retreat, don't you think that it would be useful to have something that you can take with you to Bible studies, marriage retreats, study and fellowship with other rcc at places that are not your home, and maybe even a mass....if expositional teaching was part of mass??
Thanks Mr. Gutenberg (no, not Steve).
sorry. don’t take turns with people who can’t face reality.
If a large group of Catholics became stranded on an island, or were forced into the ‘wilderness’ somehow, how would you be able to worship???
Would your religion fall apart until you were able to build a church and collect all of it’s aids to worship???
Of course Catholics would be able to worship.
But what does this have to do with the church pictured in 1380?
Of course it would. I said I'm shopping around.
....if expositional teaching was part of mass??
It is and always has been.
“So if you said the same thing only used Black for Catholic and White for Protestant, it wouldn’t be bigotry? Even if “true?””
In this case. I WAS black...Saw it. Observed it. It’s true. And it is indicitive of the product of the rcc. A lot of Protestant churchs are equally as bad, but we’re talking about your rcc here, now.
Was Christ a bigot when He said, “by their fruit you shall know them?” Was the Lord a bigot when He stated that out of the mouth proceeds the contents of the heart?
Thanks Mr. Gutenberg (no, not Steve).
baruch HaShem, that He chose Tyndale and Gutenburg to do His Divine Will !
And yet Mary is not the object of worship.
In my 30+ wasted years in the rcc, attending masses, going to catholic school, attending catechism....
I have come in contact with MANY friends, their families, my family, my in-laws family....and in only 2 exceptions have I seen ANY evidence of a people living for Christ.
Thank you!
IF...and I do mean IF, Christ has chosen to regenrate you within the rcc, then I along with the angles praise His work in you.
If you mean the RCC, you are wrong.
...Anglicans are among the many today who laud Tyndale as the "father of the English Bible." But it was their own founder, King Henry VIII, who in 1531 declared that, "the translation of the Scripture corrupted by William Tyndale should be utterly expelled, rejected, and put away out of the hands of the people."
So troublesome did Tyndale's Bible prove to be that in 1543 — after his break with Rome — Henry VIII again decreed that "all manner of books of the Old and New Testament in English, being of the crafty, false, and untrue translation of Tyndale . . . shall be clearly and utterly abolished, extinguished, and forbidden to be kept or used in this realm."
Ultimately, it was the secular authorities who proved to be the end for Tyndale. He was arrested and tried (and sentenced to die) in the court of the Holy Roman Emperor in 1536. His translation of the Bible was heretical because it contained heretical ideas — not because the act of translation was heretical in and of itself. In fact, the Catholic Church would produce a translation of the Bible into English a few years later (the Douay-Rheims version, whose New Testament was released in 1582 and whose Old Testament was released in 1609).
http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?recnum=4749
The only reason to thank Tyndale is to express gratitude for his flawed anti-Catholic mistranslation of Scripture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
