Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr
[***Wikipedia is written by anonymous sources who submit articles. Facts taken from wiki are suspect at best. I’d rely on some other sources. I have, note for example Schaff. And he supports what I said regarding the power of the RCC in the Middle ages aka, Dark Ages. *** So does that other purulent anti Catholic bigot Ian Paisley. ] ***And try keeping focused on the issue, which was the language of the common people, which was not Latin. *** The common people couldn’t read. Focus, focus. ***That’s correct, and where the British Empire took over, the Bible followed and literacy with it.*** It was not strict cause and effect and the time span was several hundred years. Literacy in 1600s England - at the time when the Empire and wealth were flourishing was only 30% for men and 10% for women. Rather, wealth and leisure were increasing and only those in history up until recently who were literate were those with the wealth and leisure to be able to pursue it.

First, you attack the source, which is typical when you can't deal with the facts.

Second, Latin stopped being the spoken language of the common people long before the 1600's-try to keep up.

Third, the increase in literacy levels came with the increase of Bibles in the peoples own spoken language

And along with the King James, most homes in the Colonies and later the U.S. had Pilgrims Progress and Fox's Book of Martyrs.

Now don't waste my time anymore with your useless posts.

The sluggard is wiser in his own conceit than seven men that can render a reason.

1,388 posted on 06/04/2008 2:53:26 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies ]


To: All

Old French (9th-13th centuries). The dialects of Northern Gaul developed into separate language (Langue d’oil, see below) with a grammar of its own. The first written materials in it date from the Strasbourg Oaths of 842. The Old French literature flourished since the 10th century (chansons de geste etc.). French in this period was already taught in the neighboring countries (especially in Germany). In 11th-13th centuries it was the dominant language of the English administration (see more in the Romance Influences on English). It was, also, the language of the crusaders in the Levantine countries.
Middle French (14th-15th centuries). This period was marked by changes both in the pronunciation and in the grammar. A common literary language, based on the dialect of Île de France (the region of Paris), was promoted by the writers. French was replacing Latin in the texts of the public administration in France.

http://www.orbilat.com/Languages/French/French.html


1,389 posted on 06/04/2008 2:59:09 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]

To: fortheDeclaration

***First, you attack the source, which is typical when you can’t deal with the facts.***

First, Wiki is written by anyone and therefore a suspect source especially for rigourous or intellectually challenging subjects.

Second, you cited Schaff as a source on the role of the Church. Schaff is anti Catholic; you may do as well to quote another anti Catholic such as Ian Paisley. If you have Church sources to back up your statements, then I will indeed accept them.

***Second, Latin stopped being the spoken language of the common people long before the 1600’s-try to keep up.***

You keep switching back and forth between claims of Jewish literacy at the time of Christ, medieval literacy, and more modern literacy. The common people before the 1600s were illiterate, period. Even England, the most literate land in the world, only had 30% literacy for men and 10% literacy for women - the clergy, the nobles and the merchants. The US was far behind and arguably has never caught up to England to this day.

***Third, the increase in literacy levels came with the increase of Bibles in the peoples own spoken language***

Well after - the primary cause was the increase in wealth and leisure which mirrors the increase in literary rates in cities like Athens, Sparta, Rome, Alexandria, Babylon, Constantinople and eventually the cities in the West. These other examples did not have Bibles and yet mirrored the same outcome.

***And along with the King James, most homes in the Colonies and later the U.S. had Pilgrims Progress and Fox’s Book of Martyrs.***

You have proof of Pilgrims Progress and Fox? In what years? I realize that these fictional books extolling personal martyrdom were popular, but I’d like to see some proofs please.

***Now don’t waste my time anymore with your useless posts.***

Are you saying that you quite adequately waste your own time and don’t need my contributions?

***The sluggard is wiser in his own conceit than seven men that can render a reason. ***

2 Pet 2:
1
There were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will introduce destructive heresies and even deny the Master who ransomed them, bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2
Many will follow their licentious ways, and because of them the way of truth will be reviled.
3
In their greed they will exploit you with fabrications, but from of old their condemnation has not been idle and their destruction does not sleep.

If you like, I can post yet another list of heresies that those people who reject the Church of Jesus Christ choose to select from for their personal theologies, like the menu at a Chinese restaurant.


1,390 posted on 06/04/2008 3:23:40 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson