May I assume there's some good reason the "many" are not named?
This one sentence qualifies the whole piece as hogwash.
This is LDS caucus a closed session it is not open for debate it LDS News.
Please respect this thread!
I have never barge in on other closed threads to disrupt do you not believe in the golden rule!
‘Hogwash’? ... More like effluent from the hogs. But some obviously need this for their heresy diet. Reminds me of the childish ‘if you don’t play by my rules I’ll take the ball and end the game’, only in this case the ‘children’ are trying to destroy Orthodox Christianity in order to establish their cultish beliefs as valid replacements. Or would that be ‘restored’, as in the current LDS campaign to discredit Christian Orthodoxy just enough to supplant it with Mormonism?... ‘But they’re such nice people, such nice families.’
I don't understand. When the New York Times does this the rest of the media swallows the story and repeats with out asking one question. So why would you question this and not that?