Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr
Egyptian scholars were definitely in short supply and Joseph Smith not only had a more exotic story, there were fewer people who could possibly debunk this fabrication.

Precisely! The Rosetta Stone was only in its earliest stages of translation (and had not yet been translated into English) when Smith wrote the Book of Mormon. It is likely that someone living in rural America was even aware of the Rosetta Stone's existence, let alone its significance.

122 posted on 04/29/2008 11:29:39 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

***Precisely! The Rosetta Stone was only in its earliest stages of translation (and had not yet been translated into English) when Smith wrote the Book of Mormon. It is likely that someone living in rural America was even aware of the Rosetta Stone’s existence, let alone its significance.***

It is likely that some folks would have signed on. Look at the moderately well educated and one would suppose, reasonably intelligent individuals that have signed on for Scientology, for instance. But they almost certainly would have been far fewer given a robust debunking with good public knowledge.


132 posted on 04/29/2008 12:06:14 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson