Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Eucharist: The Body of Christ? ("Respectful Dialogue" thread)
Our Sunday Visitor (via Catholic Culture) ^ | 1/2005 | Marcellino D'Ambrosio, Ph.D.

Posted on 04/27/2008 3:36:18 AM PDT by markomalley

The Catholic Church teaches that in the Eucharist, the communion wafer and the altar wine are transformed and really become the body and blood of Jesus Christ. Have you ever met anyone who has found this Catholic doctrine to be a bit hard to take?

If so, you shouldn't be surprised. When Jesus spoke about eating his flesh and drinking his blood in John 6, his words met with less than an enthusiastic reception. "How can this man give us his flesh to eat? (V 52). "This is a hard saying who can listen to it?" (V60). In fact so many of his disciples abandoned him over this that Jesus had to ask the twelve if they also planned to quit. It is interesting that Jesus did not run after his disciples saying, "Don't go — I was just speaking metaphorically!"

How did the early Church interpret these challenging words of Jesus? Interesting fact. One charge the pagan Romans lodged against the Christians was cannibalism. Why? You guessed it. They heard that this sect regularly met to eat human flesh and drink human blood. Did the early Christians say: "wait a minute, it's only a symbol!"? Not at all. When trying to explain the Eucharist to the Roman Emperor around 155AD, St. Justin did not mince his words: "For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Sav­ior being incarnate by God's word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the word of prayer which comes from him . . . is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus."

Not many Christians questioned the real presence of Christ's body and blood in the Eucharist till the Middle Ages. In trying to explain how bread and wine are changed into the body and blood of Christ, several theologians went astray and needed to be corrected by Church authority. Then St. Thomas Aquinas came along and offered an explanation that became classic. In all change that we observe in this life, he teaches, appearances change, but deep down, the essence of a thing stays the same. Example: if, in a fit of mid-life crisis, I traded my mini-van for a Ferrari, abandoned my wife and 5 kids to be beach bum, got tanned, bleached my hair blonde, spiked it, buffed up at the gym, and took a trip to the plastic surgeon, I'd look a lot different on the surface. But for all my trouble, deep down I'd still substantially be the same ole guy as when I started.

St. Thomas said the Eucharist is the one instance of change we encounter in this world that is exactly the opposite. The appearances of bread and wine stay the same, but the very essence or substance of these realities, which can't be viewed by a microscope, is totally transformed. What was once bread and wine are now Christ's body and blood. A handy word was coined to describe this unique change. Transformation of the "sub-stance", what "stands-under" the surface, came to be called "transubstantiation."

What makes this happen? The power of God's Spirit and Word. After praying for the Spirit to come (epiklesis), the priest, who stands in the place of Christ, repeats the words of the God-man: "This is my Body, This is my Blood." Sounds to me like Genesis 1: the mighty wind (read "Spirit") whips over the surface of the water and God's Word resounds. "Let there be light" and there was light. It is no harder to believe in the Eucharist than to believe in Creation.

But why did Jesus arrange for this transformation of bread and wine? Because he intended another kind of transformation. The bread and wine are transformed into the Body and Blood of Christ which are, in turn, meant to transform us. Ever hear the phrase: "you are what you eat?" The Lord desires us to be transformed from a motley crew of imperfect individuals into the Body of Christ, come to full stature.

Our evangelical brethren speak often of an intimate, personal relationship with Jesus. But I ask you, how much more personal and intimate can you get? We receive the Lord's body into our physical body that we may become Him whom we receive!

Such an awesome gift deserves its own feast. And that's why, back in the days of Thomas Aquinas and St. Francis of Assisi, the Pope decided to institute the Feast of Corpus Christi.


TOPICS: Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,941-1,945 next last
To: Petronski

Ironic ain’t it?


161 posted on 04/27/2008 11:43:45 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
It is a "trial run" to see if the Religion Forum is ready for a third type of thread: open, closed, "respectful dialogue."

Free Republic is pro-God but there are many beliefs under that classification and none of them will be selected as "the" official one.

162 posted on 04/27/2008 11:44:49 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The rod of Aaron, the tablets of Moses, and the golden tumors that the Philistines put in it?


163 posted on 04/27/2008 11:45:10 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, weÂ’re still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I have no obligation to respect disrespect.

"Owe nothing to anyone except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law."

- Romans 13:8


164 posted on 04/27/2008 11:45:25 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
[ I have not said others are being disrespectful, but rather saying/posting something that is disrespectful. ]

Did too... I used to have a wife that operated on that logical level..
(hands on hips) (glasees pulled down on my nose)
SO THERE...

165 posted on 04/27/2008 11:46:00 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
It was funny that today's readings lead our priest into talking about being able to see things. He talked about the real presence in terms such as we have or need the eyes of faith to see it.

Also Father reminded us that Jesus chooses to become bread and wine in order to stay with us daily. I am not doing the homily justice but it was great how we were talking about it this morning here came the answer.

It also struck me that the first reading is where we might have gotten the sacrament of Confirmation from. I will have to look further, but that is what stuck out further to me.

166 posted on 04/27/2008 11:47:16 AM PDT by defconw (Pray for Snow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

More beautiful Scripture, though something of a non-sequitur.


167 posted on 04/27/2008 11:47:49 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
[ Really? You posted this to me: ]

Only IF you believe the RCC is the respository of all things Holy(on this planet)..

168 posted on 04/27/2008 11:48:02 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

To become one with him.


169 posted on 04/27/2008 11:48:27 AM PDT by defconw (Pray for Snow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I am sorry you cannot see the difference.


170 posted on 04/27/2008 11:48:35 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
You addressed the statement to me no matter what I believe about the RCC. My name was in the "to:" box and you said "Only if you..." (again, my emphasis added).
171 posted on 04/27/2008 11:50:13 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

What do you mean? Even the most devoted Roman Catholics don’t believe this.


172 posted on 04/27/2008 11:50:33 AM PDT by beachdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
It is a "trial run" to see if the Religion Forum is ready for a third type of thread: open, closed, "respectful dialogue."

From reading the thread (I just saw it a couple of minutes ago), I think for this to work, we need to better define what "respectful dialogue" does and does not include. It seems like the rhetoric has been toned down by many posters, and some of the "disrespectful" comments are as much hard-to-break habits as anything else.

My 2 cents. Thank you for considering this as a possibility.

173 posted on 04/27/2008 11:50:33 AM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
A few years ago I decided to try an experiment. I would try to align my life and thoughts and mind and heart according to the idea that God is working within me 100%. Every good thought, instinct and deed I had, I decided to attribute to the Holy Spirit. And every negative, foul thought, instinct and deed I would attribute to my resisting the Holy Spirit.

And in a short while I realized this was exactly how life had always been, though I hadn't been really aware of it.

And I knew then just how much richer life was when I understood this truth.

Not my righteousness; Christ's. Not my obedience; Christ's. Not my good works; Christ's. All graciously, freely and mercifully imputed to my account by God for His glory.

I like this approach. Thank you for mentioning it. He must increase, I must decrease.

174 posted on 04/27/2008 11:51:46 AM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I keep waiting for to break out...but so far no love.
175 posted on 04/27/2008 11:53:36 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
[ Please do not make this personal. ]

What question then CAN we ask then?..
You know that are not personal..

I asked you to define yourself.. I did not define you..

176 posted on 04/27/2008 11:55:10 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

I don’t believe that this thread was “a ploy to put out a trap in order to flame-bait other groups in order to censure and or ban others and seize the religion forum for other church”.

Not for one moment do I believe that.

However, I do believe this thread has been side-tracked from its original intent.

It has been another eye-opener to me as to the very nature of these threads.


177 posted on 04/27/2008 11:55:39 AM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Do you have that in MP3?


178 posted on 04/27/2008 11:57:01 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
I am watching the thread with great interest. And you are correct, language appears to be the stumbling block so far.

On the previous thread, there was a suggestion that offensive posts simply be ignored. That might work. We'll see if it catches on.

179 posted on 04/27/2008 11:58:06 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
I asked you to define yourself...

You also stated that I parse like an ACLU lawyer. I apologize if you did not intend that as an insult.

It IS an insult.

180 posted on 04/27/2008 11:58:33 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,941-1,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson