[Quix]

The little red x above is an illustration . . .

something like . . . the RC assertions that something

is

in

Scripture

when

it REALLY is NOT.

It's SUPPOSED to be there, according to the RC magicsterical. But it's really NOT there.

However, the most appropriate response to Post #122 still is:

[papertyger]

It's SUPPOSED to be there... But it's really NOT there.

Oh, but it IS there! Only the insane will argue with the law of identity. Whether or not someone 'approves' it is totally irrelevant.