Some do and some don't. The Catholic Holy Tradition gave you the Holy Gospel.
Those examples I have been shown are veiled and subject to interpretive endeavors.
Like any other scriptural claim, mariological exegesis is necessary to clarify them. This is why the exegesis has to be grounded in the Holy Tradition and not in 19-20c mariophobic fantasies.
No, they didn't. The Gospel came from words and deeds of Christ, recorded in the writings of the first apostles and disciples, most all of whom were Jewish. They were not "Catholic", nor ever self identified as such.
There was no "catholic church", at that time that the writings were first being widely circulated, and no "Catholic Holy Tradition", at the time of the earliest, and next earliest generation of apostles and followers of Christ. All that "Catholic" labeling stuff, came somewhat later...although the they DID recognize the body of written works, that at the time of the founding of the "RCC", had already been widely circulated, and accepted for some time, as being 'canonical', and accurate.
We can however, thank the exacting, painstaking work of many Catholic monks who preserved it. And I do.
That is not precisely true, but I won't argue the point here...
Like any other scriptural claim, mariological exegesis is necessary to clarify them. This is why the exegesis has to be grounded in the Holy Tradition and not in 19-20c mariophobic fantasies.
But it is the Scriptural claim that is in question. I can think of no belief, broadly held by Christianity that does not have evidence of a very strong theme in both the Word and the Prophecy, to say the least. Mary does not.