[Quix]

Such a conclusion would be 100% wrong, inaccurate, false. 100%

Try again. Your assumptions are greatly off the mark.

Some RC’s understand. So I know it’s possible.

Please try again.

[magisterium]

Your pro-forma denial runs counter to the evidence I referenced for any reasonable observer. Your posts that I cited (and others since then) are just snarky. They do not substantively address this thread, they just mock what you no-doubt wrap up as "Romanism." I assume you can understand your own writing? Good. Then I suggest you go back to the referenced posts, and objectively read them. You could not possibly do that and take your own rebuttal - to which I am responding here - seriously.

The entire point to Judith Anne's thread from last weekend (see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1997474/posts ) was that she needed to leave because of all the sniping, hurtful, baiting and generally disrespectful postings on the Religion Forum. They were getting in the way of her spiritual peace. You seemed to concur completely with her sentiments. Yet, while your posts here are not the most egregious examples by any means, you manage to emulate that which Judith Anne decried five times by post 15 of this thread!

"Please try again" yourself.