Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
The Church named these books to begin with, so she, — not your lying proddie pastor — is at liberty to rename them.

First, the RCC didn't name any of the Books of the Bible, espically the Old Testament.

Kings is what is in the Masoratic text.

Next time you have a difficulty because you and your conversation partner don’t seem to be referring to the same book of Kings, or the same psalm, or the same verse number in some gospel chapters, don’t clown around and ask for a clairification, just like Pet did.

Second, my comment on 1Sam.18 was not even addressed to 'Pet' it was addressed to someone else.

He stepped in started mentioning nonsense about 'rock throwing' and I had to ask him what he was talking about.

So, he even had the wrong chapter, even if he was thinking the Book was called 1st Kings and not 1st Samuel.

So, once again, you have shown an absymal lack of knowledge both regarding the Bible, and the facts of what actually happened.

The Douay-Rheims has 1st and 2nd Kings with 1st and 2nd Samuel next to them in parenthesis.

And the Roman Catholic NAB just has 1st and 2nd Samuel.

163 posted on 04/12/2008 10:49:49 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
the RCC didn't name any of the Books of the Bible, espically the Old Testament.

Books of the Bible

165 posted on 04/12/2008 3:11:42 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson