Our Lady’s Gentle Call to Peace

Coming Home Network ^ | Joan Tussing

[Petronski]

We have no need to use rocks against you.

Logic and words work just fine.

[magisterium]

That's weak. Especially when part of what I am asking you to explain is the appearance of hypocrisy when one juxtaposes your own, acknowledged, propensity for "vivid" dissertations against Catholicism against your profession to be one with Judith Anne (repeatedly, and at length) in her dismay about hostility on this forum. I should think you'd want to explain this, at least. Oh, well...

[Quix]

That’s conceivable . . . maybe even in this lifetime with sufficient miracles.

Perhaps . . . perhaps . . . when

. . . there’s

a great deal more evidence of seeing eyes; listening ears and hearing hearts.

[steve86]

One poster here seems to be the perfect human counterpart of the caricature animations he often posts. I don’t think he sees the irony. The SuperNova rants only add cartoonish ambiance. Basically, the difference between the best stated Catholic arguments and the ongoing Nickelodeon production is like the difference between Chief Justice John Roberts and James Cramer of CNBC (Bless you if you’ve been graced with never having had to witness the latter act).

[Quix]

What a lovely ADDITIONAL gratuitous personal assault.

Much thanks for the points.

[steve86]

You’re welcome. I’m limiting myself to one or fewer per day out of respect for zoo animal diversity.

[fortheDeclaration]

We have no need to use rocks against you. Logic and words work just fine.

I didn't say anything about rocks.

I would like to see some actual proof and not just alot of empty rhetoric.

[Petronski]

What did you post from Kings? About David and Goliath?

We don’t need to use rocks against the enemies of Christ’s Church.

[fortheDeclaration]

What did you post from Kings? About David and Goliath? We don’t need to use rocks against the enemies of Christ’s Church.

My goodness, you aren't that ignorant of the Bible are you?

1Sam.17 deals with David and Goliath.

1Ki.18:27 deals with Elijah mocking the Baal priests.

Very sad.

[annalex]

The Protestant bibles have the few books that escaped Luther’s scissors named differently. We have 1-4 Kings, Elijah’s episode being in 3 Kings 18. Sad indeed.

[fortheDeclaration]

The Protestant bibles have the few books that escaped Luther’s scissors named differently. We have 1-4 Kings, Elijah’s episode being in 3 Kings 18. Sad indeed.

The naming of the books of the Bible, 1 and 2 Samauel and 1 and 2nd Kings is found in the Roman Catholic NAB as well.

Moreover, I gave the chapter as IKi. 18, which wouldn't have been David and Goliath anyway, which is chapter 17, not 18.

So stop blaming Protestants for your own ignorance.

[annalex]

1 Kings 18:27 is about Philistines’ foreskins obtained by David as trophy. Petronski was puzzled by your anotomical references, jus tlike anyoen else would, and asked for clarification. Knowing that you’ll never figure this out, I came to your rescue. You seem cross today.

[Quix]

". . . the few books . . . "

Ahhhhh . . . 66 = few!

so, now . . . we have . . .

in addition to

--Rubber Bibles--
--Rubber histories--
--Rubber dictionaries--
--Rubber logic--

we also have as a gift from the RC edifice . . .

--Rubber mathematics!--

I bet convicted criminals are happy that judges sentencing them to "a few years" don't use the RC rubber mathematics text as a sentencing guide!

[magisterium]

Wow! Your post 43, purportedly made in reply to my post 42, makes ab-so-lute-ly no sense in the context of what I had to say to you. Do you endeavor to read entire posts, or do you simply scan them in two seconds and respond to what you think the gist of them might be? Do we even speak the same language? I'm not too sure we do.

[Quix]

I don’t really know of any enemies of Christ’s church regularly posting on the religion forum.

I suppose we could speculate about how much damage the closet idolators and blasphemers do damage to the Church Universal . . . but I doubt that would be overly fruitful. I think the quite serious damage is done to their own spiritual relationship—or lack thereof—with God, Himself.

[Quix]

Do we speak the same language?

Actually, I've not been quite convinced that we are in the same galactic cluster, much less on the same planet . . .

That's weak. Especially when part of what I am asking you to explain is the appearance of hypocrisy when one juxtaposes your own, acknowledged, propensity for "vivid" dissertations against Catholicism against your profession to be one with Judith Anne (repeatedly, and at length) in her dismay about hostility on this forum. I should think you'd want to explain this, at least. Oh, well...

42 posted on 4/8/2008 2:43:46 PM by magisterium

To: magisterium; . . .

That’s conceivable . . . [that I MIGHT want to explain such things . . . ] maybe even in this lifetime with sufficient miracles.

Perhaps . . . perhaps . . . when

. . . there's

a great deal more evidence of seeing eyes; listening ears and hearing hearts.

However, for the present, the cost/benefit analysis isn't looking too good.

[Quix]

You really didn’t know that hyperbolic was my middle name, bloodline, avocation and hobby?

What a surprise! What a surprise!

Oh, Dear. There I go again! [slapping fingers]

[Quix]

I construe it that your assertion stands as your assertion . . . along with a long list of other RC rep assertions that . . . are grossly underwhelming.

[Quix]

What sweetness and light!

No doubt from the pulsing radiant heart of the Magnificent Earth Mother?

Quite impressive. Is there a video? You might try it on YouTube.

I’d suggest editing out the UFO aspects of the apparition, however. Tends to detract from the fantasies and illusions of the ‘faithful.’

[Petronski]

I don’t really know of any enemies of Christ’s church regularly posting on the religion forum.

Look in your nearest mirror.