[Mad Dawg]

I refer you to #852 Where the following appears:

But she is not the One for whom all things were created, the Firstborn of every creature, and yet this is what Catholic theology claims.
[Emphasis duh]

Now you say :

I do not know what Protestant made such a claim, but it sounds like you are putting up a straw man argument.

1000 Silverlings said it. (Mind you, I AM just assuming he is a Protestant. The way he badmouths sheep and goats, I think the evidence is good.)

Have I settled that to your satisfaction? Does it still sound like I am putting up a straw man argument?

[fortheDeclaration]

But she is not the One for whom all things were created, the Firstborn of every creature, and yet this is what Catholic theology claims. [Emphasis duh] Now you say : I do not know what Protestant made such a claim, but it sounds like you are putting up a straw man argument. 1000 Silverlings said it. (Mind you, I AM just assuming he is a Protestant. The way he badmouths sheep and goats, I think the evidence is good.) Have I settled that to your satisfaction? Does it still sound like I am putting up a straw man argument?

First, it wasn't an argument that I was making.

Second, What is interesting is what you left out of the post to me, which showed by its context that 'silver' was making an issue out of Christ being our intercessor with God and not Mary.

A simple post to silver would have cleared up the confusion, but it is always easier battling strawmen.