Explaining Calvinism to me, or giving fantastic interpretation of the scripture is not subtantiating an allegation that there is a contradiction. The former, you did. The latter you did not. If however, you now admit that what we have here is difference of interpretation, then that is exactly what I ask, a retraction. So you understand now that the Catholic mariology and hagiology are consistent with the Catholic understanding of the Holy Scripture?
With the rest of your post I don't have an objection: yes, of course, Christ is the source of all grace and judges, as well as saves, Mary and all the saints.
I don't see the need for a retraction since I never said your understanding was not consistent with the Roman Catholic interpretation of the scriptures. As far as the scriptures I quoted and the interpretation of them as being “fantastic interpretation of the scripture” please show by the scriptures where the interpretation is “fantastic”? Comparing scripture with scripture, the interpretation seems clear.
Paul in Gal. 4:4 does not even mention Mary by name or venerate her but simply says, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law”.