First you spoke of me by name and did not give me the courtesy of a ping.
Secondly, “The conclusion you have reached has led you into asserting that Mary and Christ were the same substance. Read Opus’ description again. It’s outlandish to draw these conclusions.”
A conjecture is not a conclusion. Even you might understand that not even Scripture is against scientific inquiry.
“But it is the same procedure the RCC always follows when it takes a simple truth and explodes it into pagan fiction. Like when the RCC refers to Mary as the “Mother of God,” and then procedes to give her all the offices and qualities of God Himself.”
This is your opinion and your opinions are usually couched in ways to be patently offensive.
That says more about you than about your religion. I have enough respect for other people not to base my opinion on the example of one.
I’m firm in what I believe and what I know to be true.
I won’t tolerate the behavior of a poster who insinuates that what I say is teaching with the full power and authority of the Church.
I do not tolerate people who are so stupidly blind that they cannnot appreciate a discovery.
Give those high - 5’s people. Giggle at your coup.
I’ll be giving thanks to God that this discovery has been made.
Sorry. I forgot your name.
You wrote:
Mary is the Ark carrying the Lord in her womb. She is not only nourishing Him with her cells and blood, but he is also creating His cells in her.
He is man and God, the Hypostatic Union so those cells within her are the perfect Hypostatic Union of Him.
God couldn’t allow this Ark to be disposed of like anyone else
Please point us to what you believe to be the "conjecture" in those statements.