LOGIC AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF PROTESTANTISM

The Coming Home Network ^ | Brian W. Harrison

[wmfights]

It’s all good, brother.

[blue-duncan]

“So where’s the prophesy of Lk 2:29?”

Luke 2:26, “And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.”

[Quix]

Why would you expect apology for something conjured from your own imagination?

Written AS THOUGH

some things were NOT BRAZENLY

self-evident!

[wmfights]

The early church fathers never had a problem understanding what the core sets of inspirational scriptures were.

That's why they never held an ecumenical council to establish the canon. They already knew what it was.

[Petronski]

I’ll thank you again not to post images from my server space. If you want to post the laughing dog, put it on your own server.

[papertyger]

Assuming the truth of chr*stianity is no different than assuming the truth of Protestantism.

Inncorrect. Protestantism can be refuted by it's own doctrines.

[Quix]

My error.

Dear me! What a faux pas! LOL.

Apologies. Sure.

Seems to me I’ve seen it elsewhere.

LOL.

[Petronski]

I did not say not to post the image.

I said do not “post images from my server space.”

You do understand the difference?

[HarleyD]

Instead, you are stuck with the convoluted arguments of a despotic French lawyer, and his Traditions, the very arguments so artfully dismembered by the author of this piece.

No, I don't rely upon a "despotic" French lawyer.

Joh 16:13 However, when He, the Spirit of Truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth. For He shall not speak of Himself, but whatever He hears, He shall speak. And He will announce to you things to come.

As far as the "very arguments so artfully dismembered by the author", I would agree that the author is arguing against scripture-the very scripture he purports to be "inspired".

[papertyger]

When did I make such demands?

I wondered if I had missed something...

So this isn't your straw man monsieur ;o)

[Petronski]

No, I don't rely upon a "despotic" French lawyer.

Forgive me. I thought you were a Calvinist.

[Petronski]

I would agree that the author is arguing against scripture...

Then you would bear false witness against the author.

[papertyger]

Luke 2:26, "And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ."

So Simeon was quoting a prophesy of Scripture before it was written? :oD

[Quix]

How puzzling . . .

a seeming

assumption that I didn’t know the difference! LOL.

[Gamecock]

[Petronski]

“a seeming assumption?”

Oh no. Your first reply indicated you did not know the difference, so I explained it.

[Alex Murphy]

I did not say not to post the image. I said do not “post images from my server space.” You do understand the difference?

You didn't have a problem when Lineage player "Ferine" posted the "attention wh***" graphic that you keep on your server space on the Lineage Guru board. And that's a far more, shall we say, interesting graphic than the laughing dog one. I didn't see a complaint from you towards "Ferine" then, so why complain against Quix now? Unless "Ferine" is you, that is.

In either case, here's a graphical response to your complaint against Quix. Apply liberally:

[Petronski]

Precisely done. Perhaps QUIX still needs some help with the concept. I’ll leave it to you.

[Quix]

Ahhhh. I see.

Thanks much.

Appreciated.

[papertyger]

If it was so “BRAZENLY self-evident,” why did your “housemate” (whatever that means) have to explain what they thought it meant to you?

Ah, the romance of the theater....