Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Mormons Saw Romney -- In wooing evangelicals, he made some fellow LDS members uneasy
Newsweek ^ | February 8, 2008 | Sally Atkinson

Posted on 02/19/2008 4:46:10 PM PST by Zakeet

In his pursuit of the presidency, Mitt Romney held fast to his Mormon faith, though his religion remains controversial with evangelicals and some other Christians. But his determined (and ultimately futile) wooing of evangelicals led him to make some statements that didn't quite square with Mormon beliefs and culture. And the effort itself may have deepened the impression of him as inauthentic—even to some fellow Mormons.

Early in his presidential bid, Romney was asked what he thought of polygamy. Prompted by what they considered a divine revelation, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints discontinued the practice more than a century ago, and the church distances itself from polygamist "fundamentalists." But Romney went one step further, saying he couldn't "imagine anything more awful than polygamy." Many Mormons were privately taken aback. Mormons believe that, in its time, "plural marriage" was a commandment from God, and they are, as a group, fiercely proud of their ancestors, hundreds of whom practiced polygamy. (Romney's own great-grandfather had five wives.) LDS church members loathe the polygamy stereotypes and jokes bandied by outsiders. But hearing Romney—the most recognizable face of their faith these days—disavow it in those terms was mildly unsettling to LDS insiders.

Others were puzzled to hear Romney say he reads the Gideon Bible—a version popular with evangelicals: Mormons uniformly study the King James version, in a Salt Lake edition that is cross-referenced to all other Mormon scripture. "Seems like he just figured he had to say the safest, most Protestant thing he could think of—that was kind of annoying," says Russell Arben Fox, a Mormon professor of political science at Friends University in Wichita, Kans.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008election; lds; mormonism; mormonvote; obsession; pavlovian; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 781-789 next last
Comment #561 Removed by Moderator

To: Osage Orange; rickomatic
Rickomatic Said: Then KNOW this. My contention is that Mormonism, is a false doctrine hatched in the pits of hell.

I Said: Obviously, I disagree about the Church's standing with Jesus

U Said: What are your disagreements with the mormon church standing with Jesus?

My disagreement is not with my church, but with Rickmatic's assessment of it, sorry to disappoint you.

What is your issue?

I have many issues, some can be resolved with repentance, some are not sin based.
562 posted on 02/20/2008 8:51:45 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: lmiller007

God expects us to test the spirits. You can’t really tell if it’s the spirit of God or the spirit of the unholy one. The voices can sound the same. Don’t believe everything you hear. Test the spirits.


563 posted on 02/20/2008 8:53:16 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: lmiller007

Most evangelicals here know that the Mormon Church is not a traditional Christian church. We want the Mormons on these threads to realize that the Jesus you speak of is not the Jesus of the Bible. You believe he is satan’s brother, a spirit being. There are so many differences in what we both believe and Mormons are not Christians in the Biblical sense. We only want you to know the errors of the teachings. It’s not an attempt to bash anyone but to bring you the truth of the gospel. It’s because we DO love you that we bring you these messages. I wish you could all understand that.


564 posted on 02/20/2008 8:56:43 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
U Said: No, we are POSTING what leaders of YOUR Organization have said and taught in the past.

You keep trying to say that it makes no difference what they did back then.


Have you heard of Quote mining?

Quote mining is the practice of compiling frequently misleading quotes from large volumes of literature or speech.[1]

The term is pejorative. "Quote miners" are often accused of contextomy and misquotation, in an attempt to represent the views of the person being quoted inaccurately. For example, if a person being quoted disagrees with some position, a quote miner will present quotes that suggest that instead, this person is supportive of this position. Material that ostensibly bolsters this position is often taken out of context. Exposition that is at odds with the argument being made in the same text is excluded or otherwise obscured.
Mormons feel that Many anti Mormons and yes In my pinion, you are one of them, Use Quote mining to attack our church, these attacks can often be easily refuted if the poster includes a link to the source, so when a Quotation that seems to contradict what we are saying is posted without a link, we assume it to be quote mining because we see so much of it. When someone cuts quotations from an anti site for example, there is almost never a web linked quotation and it's almost always from a book that has to be looked up off line.

I have in the past spent days of spare time chasing a quotation, only to discover it does not exist, it was a lie. In the posters defense, in that case they did not know it was a lie, they were cutting from a web site that listed a source.

I try to give links to my source documents, and give lesser weight to documents that have no such links.

Just so you know why we dismiss so many of your posts, they've been debunked before.
565 posted on 02/20/2008 9:09:13 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer; Tennessee Nana
“Getting saved” is not a one-time occurrence. Repentance is a life-long process.

I would also posit that Repentance is work, or it's not repentance.
566 posted on 02/20/2008 9:12:57 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

The point I have been making is that despite this, it shouldn’t stop us from coming together for conservative causes. Let’s get over the pointless bickering.

To respond to what you said: Mormons don’t care if you don’t view them as traditional christians. If you want to be entitled to define what a traditional christian is, fine. We know what our beliefs are and are proud of them. You likes your beliefs and we are fine with that. I am not going to look down on you and refuse to vote for one of you just because you don’t attend my Church. Let’s get passed the silliness.


567 posted on 02/20/2008 9:13:08 PM PST by lmiller007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

I appreciate your advice. I pray to know the truth daily. I hope you do too.


568 posted on 02/20/2008 9:14:00 PM PST by lmiller007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
U Said: First of all, the Old and New Testament Scriptures are replete with references to Christ literally being God, and not in the "flesh" sense of Adam and Eve becoming "one".

Interesting, what about John 17:22, you missed that one.

I Said: As for Mormons being Christian, Show me in the Bible where it says you have to interpret the Bible to mean Trinity to be a Christian.

U Said: Rejecting the trinity rejects the nature of the true God, who is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Since we are arguing if this is what the Bible actually says, this is Begging the Question, which is a fallacy.

U Said: Belief in separate entities would be it a polytheistic religion. And God is but ONE.

Again, you assume you are right, and therefore, you are right, LOL! Back to debate 101 for you.

Mormons are not polytheistic.
569 posted on 02/20/2008 9:29:29 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

You don’t care for circular reasoning? A few of these posters have a habit of assuming what they set out to prove.


570 posted on 02/20/2008 9:32:13 PM PST by lmiller007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

I’m not “debating” with you Joseph Smith’s version of reality, any more than I will debate with you what an egg “is”.

In its most basic form, 1 egg is composed of three essential, equal parts: a shell, a yolk, and an egg white. That is what makes up an egg. Period.

You can either accept it or not. But your denying of that statement does NOT change what “it” is in its most basic form and explanation.

The same is applied to God.

The Scriptures speak to God being the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, three but one, hence, a trinity. This is but one of the most basic foundations of Christianity.

Believing that God is not “three beings as one God” necessitates a completely different religion. It turns it into a polytheistic rather than a monotheistic belief system.

This “completely different religion” is, in fact, exactly what Joseph Smith wanted. In fact, he was “told all the Christian religions are apostate.”

The stories he told when forming his “new” religion rejects exactly what makes the Christian religions, in their essence, Christian, and is exactly what separates the Mormons from Christianity. Period.


571 posted on 02/20/2008 9:40:31 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
I said: I am giving others the chance to ask about a religion without being accused of attacking it.

U said: In that case DU, when you are asked about certain items fo your beliefs, give a straight answer...

First, I am loathe to go into too much detail on a religion I don't believe, and will readily bow to the wisdom and knowledge of any FLDS who wants to take up the answer, that is the religion we were talking about.

U said: Dont hem and haw and give the answer to the question that should have been asked, etc

Unfortunately, anti Mormons are fond of asking "when did you stop beating your wife questions". I always try to answer as straight forward as I can, however, you can be asked unanswerable questions, for example C.S. Lewis says:

Can a mortal ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Quite easily, I should think. All nonsense questions are unanswerable.
I cannot answer some of the Questions asked for they are nonsense (Like the marital status of the number five for example...), and I am immeasurably more limited then God in my ability to answer questions, that is one of the reasons I champion praying about things..

U said: Dont answer a question with another question

Why not? (I just couldn't resist)

U said: Answer the question put to you to the best of your ability and knowledge and THEN ask questions back.

This is actually what I try to do, I even have some common questions posted on my page here.

U said: It’s the hedginng that gets the Christians riled up...

I beg to differ, it's the questions which assume the worst and all but answer themselves they are so twisted that get people riled up, which is the point of some posters posts.

U said: Avoiding the questions and just being flippant is like a red rag to a bull...

being Flippant when asked the same dumb questions over and over keeps me sane, well, sort of. (Grin)

U said: Most of the FReepers here have much of the goods on JS and BY... their own words in the D & C the BoM and the Pearl of Great Price etc..condemn them...

You should have read my link earlier to Quote mining, Here, let me repeat it:
Quote mining is the practice of compiling frequently misleading quotes from large volumes of literature or speech.

The term is pejorative. "Quote miners" are often accused of contextomy and misquotation, in an attempt to represent the views of the person being quoted inaccurately. For example, if a person being quoted disagrees with some position, a quote miner will present quotes that suggest that instead, this person is supportive of this position. Material that ostensibly bolsters this position is often taken out of context. Exposition that is at odds with the argument being made in the same text is excluded or otherwise obscured.
Many of the quotations, if not all you are speaking of are the product of Quote mining, I've chased down enough of them to know.

U said: There’s no denying the obvious...

I agree, it's obvious that the methods employed by those involved in debates on religion on both sides are often Crude arguments and lack the training acquired in formal debate. For example, you are trying to claim victory by claiming it is "obvious" that you have won, this is a Hasty Generalization Fallacy.
572 posted on 02/20/2008 10:05:48 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
As for Presbyterians being Abominable, Show me in the BoM where it says if you interpret the Bible to mean Trinity you are a heretic doomed to the lowest depths.

I Cannot for no one has doomed you to the lowest depths of Hell.
573 posted on 02/20/2008 10:07:45 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Send ME some money and I’ll stroke your ego and tell you how smart you are!

Hey, can I get in on this?

money

Is that enough, or do you need More?
money
574 posted on 02/20/2008 10:10:59 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Um wrong. We aren’t “making up out of whole cloth” something that isn’t already in the Old and New Testament Scriptures about WHO God is: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit = God = Three = “tri” you know, latin and all that from which we, in English, base most of our language.

This is quite different from that which is taught in Mormonism which IS made up out of whole cloth.


The one substance part is what we have a problem with, not the three part...
575 posted on 02/20/2008 10:13:06 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
How pious the lot of you, shall we bow down or genuflex?:)

When you hear that the LDS recogized that Lucifer who fell from grace was once a light bearer among the Morning stars who sang for glory and that Lucifer was once among the sons of God, what thoughts do you conjure up?

576 posted on 02/20/2008 10:22:06 PM PST by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
God expects us to test the spirits. You can’t really tell if it’s the spirit of God or the spirit of the unholy one. The voices can sound the same. Don’t believe everything you hear. Test the spirits.

Mary tell us how you test the spirits?

577 posted on 02/20/2008 10:23:22 PM PST by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

“Getting saved” is not a one-time occurrence. Repentance is a life-long process.

I would also posit that Repentance is work, or it’s not repentance.

***

Did you see this?


578 posted on 02/20/2008 10:26:16 PM PST by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Sorry for got the link! LLOL

Excerpt; Good illistration on repentance
http://www.byu.tv/index.html?start=61622.457&stop=61991.656&show=&ep=http://qmplive.xlontech.net/byutv/stream/080219.qvt


579 posted on 02/20/2008 10:28:45 PM PST by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: restornu; Marysecretary

Joseph Smith, actually. He also thought himself equal.


580 posted on 02/20/2008 10:29:41 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 781-789 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson