~”Can you please provide me with just one link that shows you have done this?”~
I gave up doing so last summer. If you’re interested in going back that far, feel free to take a look at my posting history. I don’t sense you are being genuine, so I’m not inclined to invest the effort myself.
~”Are these not genuinely valid questions?”~
They are valid. They are also answered. Ad nauseum.
~”Intent of what?”~
Intent of learning something and engaging in thoughtful dialogue, rather than an attempt to lay a rhetorical trap. The latter is the general approach with the questions you have asked. (You see, they are canned questions that are easily identified, so I recognize the MO very well.)
~”And what assurance do you require?”~
Your word will be fine. If you aren’t truly interested in the answers, then I suggest you don’t give it.
My first posting on Mormonism was in October 2007. Again, I challenge you to provide a link.
Re: Are these not genuinely valid questions? ... They are valid. They are also answered. Ad nauseum.
Still one more time, I challenge you to provide a link.
Re: Intent of learning something and engaging in thoughtful dialogue, rather than an attempt to lay a rhetorical trap.
I want nothing better than to enter into a thoughtful dialog. Of course, that necessitates an examination of facts. How about we start examining those presented in my Challenge?
I'm not sure what you mean by laying a rhetorical trap. Would you please define the term and provide me with an example where I have done this?
Re. And what assurance do you require? ... Your word will be fine.
I assure you we both agree time and all eternity is at stake, and it is therefore critical to learn the truthful answer to these questions.