Dogmatic, perhaps; intolerant, no; but don’t confuse toleration for condoning particular issues.
~”Dogmatic, perhaps; intolerant, no; but don’t confuse toleration for condoning particular issues.”~
Certainly not. The term “anti-Mormon” has been very well defined by the original article, I think.
You can disagree with me all you want, and you can be as vehement as you like about your disagreement. You don’t have to condone my beliefs by any means. But a line is crossed when you decide that my faith must be refuted, that such ends justify the means, and that you must lie, misrepresent, and distort what I believe in order to do so. That person is an anti-Mormon, a religious bigot, and certainly not a Christian in their heart.
As for the honest disagreement? I welcome it.