Are you comparing a dog getting a yummy treat to our everlasting life? We really do have completely different theologies, sir. And a completely different understanding of God.
LOL! No. I am arguing against the proposition put forth by Kosta that we can either understand everything of God, or virtually nothing of Him at all. I was saying that just as a dog can have SOME real understanding, although it is not exhaustive, so too can humans have SOME understanding of God that is perfectly true, although not exhaustive. That's it. :) I would actually expect you to agree with me on this.
***I am arguing against the proposition put forth by Kosta that we can either understand everything of God, or virtually nothing of Him at all. I was saying that just as a dog can have SOME real understanding, although it is not exhaustive, so too can humans have SOME understanding of God that is perfectly true, although not exhaustive.***
I would agree with both of you to the extent that we have a better understanding of God than a dog would of us; yet we only can understand what we as humans CAN understand of the infinite Creator which is extremely little.