That's exactly the point, Kolo. The Bible doesn't lie, of course. The autorship of 1 and 2 Peter does not in an of itself make those books "inspired." Their content and the message do.
As I said, Isaiah was written by three different individuals and in three different time periods. That does not make the Book of Isaiah a "lie."
But when the Bible becomes "God," anything other than pristine becomes a "lie" and a threat to this cult. Just as Galilleo's telescopic demonstration of crater-pocketted lunar surface was judged an "illusion created by the devil" by the Vatican observers because the celestial bodies that were in "heaven" could only be perfect because nothing that is imperfect can be in heaven!
Never mind the that the Bible says the "heaven" is just above the clouds...up there...Is that a "lie" too? Or is this a simple belief held at that time just as bats were believed to be birds? One more example that not all that is in the Bible is the "word of God." God would not write lies.
And the celestial spheres were therefore by "necessity" deemed perfect spheres and any deviations were "illusions" created by the Evil One in order to "deceive" us into believing the science.
Some have not progressed much since those days.
“And the celestial spheres were therefore by “necessity” deemed perfect spheres and any deviations were “illusions” created by the Evil One in order to “deceive” us into believing the science.”
I believe they were alleged to be made of crystal too!