You made insubstantive points about the Eunuch. Phillip was duefully made a priest of the Church by the laying on of hands by the council of bishops (the Apostles) BEFORE he met the Eunuch.
= =
I realize that the chronic edifice blindness may be obscuring the obvious here . . .
However, the above assertion has nothing to do with my point.
I am used to lots of folks dodging my points, BTW.
***However, the above assertion has nothing to do with my point.
I am used to lots of folks dodging my points, BTW.***
For the record, please state your point. I had thought that your point was that Philip was not authorized by the Church and was doing the instruction and baptism of the eunuch on his own.
I countered with the fact that Philip was authorized by the Apostles, with the laying on of hands, making him clergy in the Church.
So what is your point?