[Mad Dawg]

Whether we have PROVED REASONABLY that we have faith in the correct thing is a matter of opinion.

Nice distinction.

And now we can start worrying about what Faith is -- or what constitutes "reasonably". I would venture to say that one extreme version of the Tertullianish "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" is to reject reason altogether in favor of enthusiastic utterances.

[Quix]

I’m inclined to persistently choose enthusiastic utterances over rubberized logic books any day.

[Forest Keeper]

And now we can start worrying about what Faith is -- or what constitutes "reasonably".

That sounds reasonable. :) No doubt we are inclined to consult human standards of reasonableness when evaluating theology, but I have come to think that the key is always on what each of us calls the starting point. I.e., what are our presuppositions?