And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. Revelation 19:13
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. John 1:1-4
Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. Matthew 22:29
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. - Matthew 4:4
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned. - I Corinthians 2:14
For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. I Corinthians 1:19-25
"ΤΟ ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ ΑΓΙΟΝ ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΟΝ"
"According to John", not "According to God and transcribed by John." That, AG, would be a dangerously heretical reading of the title of that Gospel. It would be a Mohammedan, and thus extra-heretical, way to read it. I know you are not a Mohammedan and thus need to ask you why you think +John was the amanuensis of Almighty God. The implications of such a role for +John and the other Gospel writers are rather extraordinary. Does your bible entitle +John's Gospel different than mine?
Oh, yes, the God's mouthpiece in flesh.
Yes, the words of God. When you ascribe John 6:63 to the Apostle John and not God, it shows the impassable divide between us.
I don't know what Bible you use, but all the bibles I have seen say Accoding to John, not Accodring to God. Now you are re-writing the Bible too?
Let me see: so far we have a self-appointed mouthpiece of God, and now changing the Bible, by being "inspired," I presume?
Again you demand physical proofs of the Spirit
I am simply responding to your matter-of-fact claims. If you can't back up your claims, keep them to yourself, or simply state them as your belief and not a fact.