is "Romanist" the preferred term now? What ever happened to "Papist"?
The rest of your question, like you tag line is silly.
***Soooo, what Romanist Council did Jesus and the Apostles fall back on to know what was Scripture?
is “Romanist” the preferred term now? What ever happened to “Papist”?***
You forget, my friend, that many of these folks believe that the KJV was complete, read by Jesus and the Apostles (in English), and hundreds of millions of them were kept in locked warehouses by the Church until liberated by the theological giants Luther and Calvin.
Further, they believe that the mutilated and vandalized versions of the Bible that they quote from were written as is, commanded by Jesus to have the content that they have, and the Catholic Church is the entity that added the Deuterocanonicals in reponse to the holy interventions of the Reformers. And the Restorationists. And every other brand spanking new theological giant who can put a different twist on a different set of out of context Biblical verse and hang out a shingle to con the rubes.
***is “Romanist” the preferred term now? What ever happened to “Papist”?***
Papist is still applicable. Romanists is a broader term that encompasses all the idolatries such as Papism, Mariology, the Mass, worshipping of Saints, etc.
***The rest of your question, like you tag line is silly***
I’d much rather be silly than blasphemously believe the Word of God only gains effectiveness with approval of man.