[kosta50]

From New Testament Greek

Home > Lexicons > Greek > Hebraisti

The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   1447

 Browse Lexicon 

Original Word	Word Origin
ÔEbrai>stiv	from (1446)
Transliterated Word	TDNT Entry
Hebraisti	3:356,372
Phonetic Spelling	Parts of Speech
heb-rah-is-tee'	Adverb

 Definition

1. in Hebrew, i.e. in Chaldee

 King James Word Usage - Total: 6

in the Hebrew tongue 3, in the Hebrew 2, in Hebrew 1

KJV Verse Count
John	4
Revelation	2
Total	6

You have not provided a single educated, academic, learned, intellectual or credible piece of evidence that the use of Hebraïsti in the NT is anything but Aramaic (Chaldee), not Hebrew.

Of course, you will notice that the KJV translates it incorrectly (imagine that!), and how one lie (oh the devil is so happy with KJV!) becomes the "truth."

You are more "Hebrew" in your zeal than the Jews, whose sources are actually rather objective. Your claims run contrary even to the Jewish Encyclopedia!

If you want to be the 'king" in your bubble world and pontificate what is true, that's your prerogative, but I am not interested in your foolishness.

You have serious issues. I am sorry for you.

You can find someone else to convince that the Greeks don't know their own language, or that  faulty, damned and corrupt English bible versions are the "word of God." You can go on living in your own little fantasy world (but I suggest you get some help

[MarkBsnr]

***Of course, you will notice that the KJV translates it incorrectly (imagine that!), and how one lie (oh the devil is so happy with KJV!) becomes the “truth.”***

If the KJV lie is exposed, then the English portion of the Reformed theology gets shaky, if not destroyed.

***You are more “Hebrew” in your zeal than the Jews, whose sources are actually rather objective. Your claims run contrary even to the Jewish Encyclopedia!***

The Jews know no more about their own language and history than the Greeks do. The millions of KJV Bibles stored in Catholic warehouses for 1500 years attest to the total completeness and the accuracy of their texts. After all, if English was good enough for Jesus, it ought to be good enough for you.

[Uncle Chip]

You have not provided a single educated, academic, learned, intellectual or credible piece of evidence that the use of Hebraïsti in the NT is anything but Aramaic (Chaldee), not Hebrew.

Why is that necessary when the Greek word "Hebraisti" and the translations by educated, learned, intellectual, credible scholars is quite clear.

Of course, you will notice that the KJV translates it incorrectly (imagine that!), and how one lie (oh the devil is so happy with KJV!) becomes the "truth."

Well then how about the learned translators of the Catholic Bible who agree with the KJV translators:

"And Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross, and there was written "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews". Many of the Jews therefore read this inscription, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, in Greek, and in Latin." [The Holy Bible, The Catholic Press, Chicago, Illinous, with the approbation of His Eminence Samuel Cardinal Stritch, 1950]

Read it and weep -- and it was written in Hebrew.