Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conclusion from Peru and Mexico
email from Randall Easter | 25 January 2008 | Randall Easter

Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,121-3,1403,141-3,1603,161-3,180 ... 6,821-6,833 next last
To: Mad Dawg

“Is that just such a legalistic Western Question that it makes you want to puke?”

Only if you are heading into that “created grace” stuff.

That’s better.


3,141 posted on 02/26/2008 4:16:35 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3140 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Most of your “spelling errors” are just that. But for some reason, that one struck me as sooooooo funny:>) I couldn’t stop laughing

But it' snot funny.... :)

3,142 posted on 02/26/2008 4:18:14 PM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3130 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum; stfassisi

“How can this be justified? This happened down through the centuries, and not just at the hands of Roman Catholics but Protestants as well. Lord have mercy on us.”

In the context of an Anglo-Saxon, post Enlightenment society, it cannot be except as a theoretical construct. In other societies, societies which were/are arguably far holier, far more likely to foster theosis in its citizens than ours, it was/is not only acceptable, it was expected and required for the good of the society and individuals.


3,143 posted on 02/26/2008 4:28:03 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3138 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum
""My question dealt with how you justify destroying things under the auspices of the magisterium. Because God told them to? How do you know? Did God give them an explicit, “secret” command to destroy things held by others who claimed to have a “secret” knowledge?""

Matt. 16:18 - Jesus says, “I will build my “Church” (not churches).

What other Churches do you think Christ was talking about?

Matt. 16:19; 18:18 - Jesus gave the apostles binding and loosing authority. But this authority requires a visible Church because “binding and loosing” are visible acts. The Church cannot be invisible, or it cannot bind and loose.

So, Jesus gave authority to bind or destroy certain things

“”Then how, pray tell, do you intend to enforce it?””

Education and Prayer and not being afraid of persecution to publicly speak out against evil

If it saves even one soul it is worthwhile to lay down your life for them if it leads them away from evil.

“”I am a great sinner, and I am in no position to sit in personal judgment of anyone. “”

I am too and it is only through extreme humility that Christ can even begin to use me.

“”Constantine commanded that the writings of Arius and his friends should everywhere be delivered up to be burned; concealment of them was forbidden under pain of death””

Constantine was not part of the Magesterium of the Church and was branded a heretic by the Early Church fathers( I can provide the writings that prove this if you wish) because he did not believe in the Divinity of Christ.

Constantine only legalized Christianity and thankfully he was only baptized on his deathbed.

It’s been over 2000 years and the catholic Church still stands as the Pillar and foundation of truth. The Gates of hell has not prevailed just as Christ promised

Isa. 35:8, 54:13-17 - this prophecy refers to the Church as the Holy Way where sons will be taught by God and they will not err. The Church has been given the gift of infallibility when teaching about faith and morals, where her sons are taught directly by God and will not err. This gift of infallibility means that the Church is prevented from teaching error by the power of the Holy Spirit (it does not mean that Church leaders do not sin!)

3,144 posted on 02/26/2008 5:03:57 PM PST by stfassisi ("Above all gifts that Christ gives his beloved is that of overcoming self"St Francis Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3138 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

INDEED!

THX.


3,145 posted on 02/26/2008 5:20:55 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3107 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

PRAISE GOD FOR YOUR FAITHFULNESS

TO

HIM!


3,146 posted on 02/26/2008 5:23:56 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3111 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

Again, you have a “church” that will tell you what to believe,and that’s not a church but a cult.

= = =

I believe that every congregation has an obligation to provide for every man an answer as do individual Christians.

However . . . mindless authoritarianism vs hooking individuals up to God and LETTING HIM LEAD THEM directly

is

cultish, at least.


3,147 posted on 02/26/2008 5:27:45 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3123 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; Ann Coulter
[ Se is a neocon replicant. Traditional Republicans are not fascists in capitalist clothing like she is. Most people don't even know what a Republican is. ]

You must have never read her books.. She is not a socialist.. or communist which is a socialist.. Most people dont know what a socialist is.. let alone a communist..

Coulter knows expressly what both are..

Republicans are for a republican form of government.. and
Democrats are for a democracy which is Mob Rule by mobsters which results in socialism..

Ann is well aware of both of them..
You know her being a Constitutional Lawyer and such..

No doubt you are a progreesive using the word facist so easily..

3,148 posted on 02/26/2008 5:46:12 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3139 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I thank you for your prayers, sir.

It didn’t turn out well - after her second divorce after me, our son had some serious issues.

I do look. And God has answered me in my prayers beyond my dreams.


3,149 posted on 02/26/2008 5:59:35 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3025 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
In other societies, societies which were/are arguably far holier, far more likely to foster theosis in its citizens than ours, it was/is not only acceptable, it was expected and required for the good of the society and individuals.

But were/are they? Or did forcefully eliminating heretical teachings just give them that appearance? (I admit I do not know the answer to this.) We confess that God does not force us to come to Him, but as far as I can tell that's exactly what was attempted: "The authorities intended to make the reading of such writings simply impossible."

3,150 posted on 02/26/2008 6:01:49 PM PST by Zero Sum (Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3143 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi; Heretic; apostate; Whosoever
[ Constantine only legalized Christianity and thankfully he was only baptized on his deathbed. ]

Constantine did more than that.. He forced the population of pagans to become christians by force if need be.. which demanded priests like they had before.. You know to organize everything..

Which the population didnt seem to care much since they worshiped idols anyway.. more or less.. I suspect less. The romans were known (many) to adopt the gods of the people they conquered takeing the problem of my god(roman gods) against your god out of the picture, somwhat. That way the conquered didnt rebel as much..

Constantine forced christ on pagans as the State sponsored religion.. Roman christianity then became somewhat nominal for most all but not all.. Nominal christians today are more or less about the same.. ceremonial acts of show.. the flesh masquerading as spirit.,

3,151 posted on 02/26/2008 6:02:38 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3144 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor

***Just because you mean well doesn’t mean that you are thinking Christian thoughts. That’s why Jesus left us the Bible, and why the Catholic Church is so evil.***

Jesus didn’t leave us the Bible. The Church did. The Reformers try to have the Bible without the Church. That is not opinion.

Evil does violence to the Truth. It lies and deceives. The Reformation tries to turn cause and effect on their heads. Jesus caused the Church; the Church caused the Bible. To say that it is else is untrue and attacks the very Truth of Jesus’ ministry on Earth. That is evil.


3,152 posted on 02/26/2008 6:03:44 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3043 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; Forest Keeper

If the early church did not believe Jesus was God or treat him as such until John wrote the Gospel around 90 A.D. then what were they celebrating in the bread and wine during communion? As Jews they were forbidden to eat or drink anything with blood and that was confirmed in the early church in Acts 15. If they did not believe Jesus was God why would they break the commandment and disobey the Elders in Jerusalem?


3,153 posted on 02/26/2008 6:04:16 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3102 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

***We are finite and God is infinite. How can a human have a personal relationship with the infinite?

That is the failure of all religions, save for Christianity. Because Christ took on also human nature, we can relate to Him in that way. Without Him, God is simply a distant and unimaginable entity.***

How in the world did I know that you would be the only one to get it. This is unimagined in the Reformed world. The Reformed God is the mover and shaker of all; the reason that one can point to when sinning with reckless abandon, and without repentence.


3,154 posted on 02/26/2008 6:07:14 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3058 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

*** Each of our lives is unique in a thousand individual way.. What a plan that God would test his plan(s) though millions of different iterations..***

Why would an all knowing, all seeing God need to test anything?


3,155 posted on 02/26/2008 6:08:39 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3063 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Constantine did not believe in the Divinity of Christ ,HP

Do you believe in the Divinity of Christ?

Do you believe Christ is God in the Flesh?


3,156 posted on 02/26/2008 6:10:18 PM PST by stfassisi ("Above all gifts that Christ gives his beloved is that of overcoming self"St Francis Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3151 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
It didn’t turn out well - after her second divorce after me, our son had some serious issues.

Sometimes the LORD takes us through trials to prepare us for something. I hope and pray it all works out.

I do look. And God has answered me in my prayers beyond my dreams.

So there you go. Life experience will reveal GOD if you look.

3,157 posted on 02/26/2008 6:22:35 PM PST by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3149 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan

***The reason the teacher tests is not to determine what he/she knows, but whether you will do what you have learned or are about to learn.***

God already knows. So what is God doing testing humans?


3,158 posted on 02/26/2008 6:26:19 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3098 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum

“But were/are they? Or did forcefully eliminating heretical teachings just give them that appearance? (I admit I do not know the answer to this.)”

On balance, I think they really were more likely to foster theosis than our societies in the West (and now the East too, I suppose). What happened in this life was of little consequence as the focus was, ultimately, on theosis. You know, only in a society like that could bishops themselves come up with the concept that the floor of hell was paved with the skulls of bishops! A political/social system headed by a God annointed Emperor presiding over a Christian Oecoumene, where the people saw themselves as members of an Omogenia fits a world where theosis is the proper goal of everyone. We see a sort of a funhouse mirror vestige of it in the whole Mohammedan idea of the Umma and a worldwide caliphate. Like I said earlier, in a system like that, different, heterodox ideas are seen as destructive and in fact they are destructive of a society like that. But that society places virtually no value on individual opinion except to the extent that it is expressed within the context of “The Church” and open questions, it should be noted, were openly and widely debated at all levels of society until a council decided a question.

What we have in the West is the inevitable result of events such as the Reformation and the Enlightenment arriving a few hundred years after Magna Carta. The system of government we have is attuned to a religious view of salvation which is near antithetical to the theosis theology of the East. This shouldn’t be surprising given what the reformers saw themselves as rebelling against. Nobody or at least no government forces people to believe one way or the other in the West. It can be argued that that has lead to a spiritually deadly, or even dead society.


3,159 posted on 02/26/2008 6:27:40 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3150 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi
Matt. 16:19; 18:18 - Jesus gave the apostles binding and loosing authority. But this authority requires a visible Church because “binding and loosing” are visible acts. The Church cannot be invisible, or it cannot bind and loose.

So, Jesus gave authority to bind or destroy certain things

Even if you take that passage as the establishment of infallible Petrine authority, nowhere does it say "destroy."

ZS: Then how, pray tell, do you intend to enforce it?

SFA: Education and Prayer and not being afraid of persecution to publicly speak out against evil

If it saves even one soul it is worthwhile to lay down your life for them if it leads them away from evil.

Well said, and that's exactly what we are called to do as Christians (and I fall far short.) This has nothing to do with violent and destructive censorship.

Constantine was not part of the Magesterium of the Church and was branded a heretic by the Early Church fathers( I can provide the writings that prove this if you wish) because he did not believe in the Divinity of Christ.

I'm well aware, but the "pain of death" part stuck out at me. Did the Roman Catholic Church oppose the death penalty then as it does now?

3,160 posted on 02/26/2008 6:33:01 PM PST by Zero Sum (Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3144 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,121-3,1403,141-3,1603,161-3,180 ... 6,821-6,833 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson