Who (besides Uncle Chip) said the second coming was fulfilled in AD70? Not I.
Besides, the second coming comes at the end of the "thousand years" not the beginning, at least according to the amil/postmil positions.
Matthew 24:30 is the second coming, thus when tc asserts that Matthew 24:30 is past tense, then what are those who read his posts supposed to conclude????
Apparently I misunderstood. A great deal of discussion has gone on whether Jesus came in the clouds physically or spiritually when the Temple and Jerusalem were destroyed in 70 AD.
Besides, the second coming comes at the end of the "thousand years" not the beginning, at least according to the amil/postmil positions.
That's my understanding as a premillenialist. However, I thought it was stated that the 1,000 yr reign was a symbolic figure to the amil/postmil believers.