To: Uncle Chip; tabsternager
And that His second "coming" [or subsequent "coming", or however one wants to try to dance around the plain meaning of that word] would also be "in the flesh", or they wouldn't be Christians, would they??? His second coming will be physical as we have been saying, and no one knows the day or hour. You just have not been listening, preferring instead to paint us as teaching something we clearly do not teach.
717 posted on
11/11/2007 5:07:34 PM PST by
topcat54
("Dispensationalism is a disease ... as contagious as polio.")
To: topcat54
His second coming will be physical as we have been saying, and no one knows the day or hour. You just have not been listening, preferring instead to paint us as teaching something we clearly do not teach.So was that supposed preterist coming of Christ in 70 AD a physical in the flesh coming oooooorrrrrrrrrr an ethereal not in the flesh coming ?????????????????
You can't have it both ways, and John calls it clearly what it is.
722 posted on
11/11/2007 5:58:24 PM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson