Not at all. Without referencing Scofield’s Notes, you show us from the Bible where "the sign of the son of man" must "literally" mean the second coming.
If you come back and say something like, "but it looks like the second coming to me" or "but everyone knows it the second coming", then we will now that your emperor is not wearing any clothes.
Give it a shot Chipper and see what you can do. Exegetes some Scripture for a change.
I just asked you a simple question and never said anything about the second coming. That is what you inferred from it. Is the question too hard for you??? Why am I not surprised. Take a stand for once. Take pride in your 70 AD interpretation. Don't run from it.