To: topcat54
I'm not surprised. If you can take swords, bows, arrows, and horses as tanks, guns, and missiles, then why should you believe it when I say AD70 is not the second coming?But do you say that "the sign of the Son of man appeared in the heavens" back there in 70 AD [per Matthew 24:30]???
-- Yes or No
486 posted on
11/09/2007 9:57:53 AM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Uncle Chip; P-Marlowe; xzins; Dr. Eckleburg; tabsternager; Lee N. Field
"the sign of the Son of man appeared in the heavens" Literally speaking, the "the sign of the Son of man" is not the second coming.
But I can understand your confusion. If you do not carefully compare Scripture with Scripture you will come up with all sorts of unbiblical notions.
493 posted on
11/09/2007 10:44:19 AM PST by
topcat54
("Dispensationalism is a disease ... as contagious as polio.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson