Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
[Luke is not explaining Matthew. They are speaking of two different events that occur at two different times. ]

That's your theory, which you cannot substantiate. On the other hand, any plain reading of the texts sees the parallel and would be in harmony with a fulfillment to "this generation" in the events of AD70.

No, that can be seen by just comparing the two in clear English.

Only by Jesuit-like mental gymnastics could anyone think otherwise.

You are letting your theology determine your scriptural interpetation.

309 posted on 11/07/2007 2:01:22 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration; topcat54
You are letting your theology determine your scriptural interpetation.

To be more specific, he is letting his preterism determine his scriptural interpretation.

312 posted on 11/07/2007 2:14:58 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson