To: Iscool
With that logic, you must agree with Gore that global warming is a trend towards oblivion and not a blip in the normal, cyclical course of history with various periods of climate change.
One hundred Christians 2,000 years ago.
One billion Christians today.
And yes. A Roman Catholic Christian is preferable to a heathen because the vector is positive. Just like a Jew is preferable to a heathen. Progressive sanctification of Christ's flock cannot help but improve the world in which they reside.
It's a wheat field; not a tare field. (I really like that line.)
1,842 posted on
11/28/2007 1:00:42 PM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg; Iscool
And yes. A Roman Catholic Christian is preferable to a heathen because the vector is positive. Just like a Jew is preferable to a heathen. Progressive sanctification of Christ's flock cannot help but improve the world in which they reside. I am stunned that you could say such a thing!
A Roman Catholic, according to the Bible is no better then any other unsaved person, he is just more deceived, thinking he is.
But it shows the deep, deceptive roots that ecumenalism has when you would defend Romanism as a postive anything!
1,873 posted on
11/30/2007 4:05:24 AM PST by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
A Roman Catholic Christian is preferable to a heathen because the vector is positive. I am sure those men and women, written about in Foxes book of Martyrs would disagree with you on how 'positive' the Papacy is.
1,875 posted on
11/30/2007 4:14:52 AM PST by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson