Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
So what are you claiming that the notes are saying to support the dispensational theory? To me this is only speaking of one time, that is the continuum of time "from everlasting".

The note says times not time.

Clearly, it is speaking of different periods of time that culminates in final in-gathering of the saints.

The note is speaking of past, present and future saints, not just present ones, as your post seem to indicate.

159 posted on 11/05/2007 1:46:44 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
The note says times not time.

If I say, "the times from Adam to Noah", am I speaking of one continuum, one period of time, or multiple, distinct periods of time? Can you tell?

The note is speaking of past, present and future saints, not just present ones, as your post seem to indicate.

Yes, but "past, present and future saints" in a single age or in multiple distinct ages? What set of presuppositions forces you to one view or the other?

161 posted on 11/05/2007 1:57:33 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism is a disease ... as contagious as polio.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson