We’ve discussed this tc and you agree that “economy” was an appropriate understanding coming out of Eph 1:10. And “economy” is roughly what is meant by a dispensation by those of us who accept the reality of “unique periods of time” (UPTs).
I think it’s on this thread, unless my memory is faulty. You can go back and look it up if you like. If it isn’t this thread, then we’ll have to try to remember the other recent “dispensationalists are meatheads” threads that you’ve posted. :>)
Let’s not put words in my mouth. "Economy" an appropriate reading for what is being discussed in Eph. 1:10. I deny that the word is therefore appropriate for any arbitrary time period designated by the dispensationalists.
And “economy” is roughly what is meant by a dispensation by those of us who accept the reality of “unique periods of time” (UPTs).
I have agreed to no such thing. What dispensationalists mean by the word is the subject under discussion. You have yet to plainly explain how the word in Eph. 1:10 gives support to the beast known as dispensationalism.
I think it’s on this thread, unless my memory is faulty. You can go back and look it up if you like. If it isn’t this thread, then we’ll have to try to remember the other recent “dispensationalists are meatheads” threads that you’ve posted. :>)
No clue. Can you point it out?