Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tantiboh
But, oh, no, he wants to hang around, blab his opinions, make his wife feel embarrassed, and harass people. Go away, already. If he ever wants to come back, and stop his silly babbling, he’ll be welcomed with open arms.

This is so incorrect, it's funny. There was no Federal law prohibiting polygamy in Joseph Smith's day, (those came a short time later - prompted precisely because of the Mormons), but every State had laws against adultery.

Adultery was defined as a man having sex with a woman other than his wife (singular). Just as todays laws say nothing specifically about gay marriage, it has always been prohibited (until the time that we are forced to address it).

Mormons were forced from State to State during Joseph Smith's time, not because they were jealous of his "revelation," but because of the practice of the aberrant multiple 'wives.'

222 posted on 09/28/2007 5:18:45 AM PDT by colorcountry (If the plain sense makes sense, seek no other sense, lest you get nonsense! ~ J. Vernon McGee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: colorcountry

Wait a second. I say, “In that day, there was no law in the United States against polygamy.”

You say, “This is so incorrect, it’s funny. There was no Federal law prohibiting polygamy in Joseph Smith’s day...”

Please, you’re confusing me.

~”...but every State had laws against adultery.”~

Fine. Smith has multiple wives. Adultery is sex -outside- of legal marriage, however that marriage is defined. Your subsequent statement is today’s definition - not that of 150 years ago. I’m sorry, it just doesn’t wash.


237 posted on 09/28/2007 6:56:54 AM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson