Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rutles4Ever
The validitiy of apostolic succession is evidenced by the election of Matthias to take the "office" of Judas

Whose office did Paul take?

52 posted on 09/13/2007 8:26:26 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35; Rutles4Ever

The Church of Denmark claims to have maintained Apostolic Succession. It doesn’t seem to have had much influence in guiding the Bishop, Mrs. Peterson.


54 posted on 09/13/2007 8:36:44 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

Paul was given office by Christ. He didn’t succeed anyone, per se. But Christ still demanded an intermediary to lay hands on Him - that being Ananias. Jesus could have restored Paul’s sight immediately, but the opening of his eyes was both a physical and spiritual healing, as well as his commission to be an apostle of the Lord. And this occured by the laying on of hands by Annias - the gesture of passing on the Holy Spirit which came to the Apostles. This line has not been broken in either the Catholic or Eastern Orthodox churches. Every bishop in either case has received the laying on of hands from a an unbroken chain going back to the upper room on Pentecost Sunday.


55 posted on 09/13/2007 8:43:37 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson