To: armydoc
Since we also have the example of the Good Thief, who did not take the Eucharist, we understand that in John 6 Jesus is talking of ordinary means of salvation, but extraordinary means exist also. It also follows logically from His sovereignty. This is literal reading of the entire New Testament; it is not an unthinking robotic reading.
208 posted on
09/12/2007 6:45:06 AM PDT by
annalex
To: annalex
Since we also have the example of the Good Thief, who did not take the Eucharist, we understand that in John 6 Jesus is talking of ordinary means of salvation, but extraordinary means exist also. It also follows logically from His sovereignty. This is literal reading of the entire New Testament; it is not an unthinking robotic reading.
Interesting that Catholics seize on "this is My Body"; no context of scripture required, don't you believe His words, He meant what He said, etc. etc. Context only becomes useful for explaining away inconvenient words that were just as plainly stated.
BTW, The Good Thief is a great example, isn't he? No baptism. No good works. No Eucharist. Just repentance and faith. The real "ordinary means" of salvation.
218 posted on
09/12/2007 11:26:49 AM PDT by
armydoc
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson