Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr; jo kus; irishtenor; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; wmfights; blue-duncan; kosta50
And your possessiveness of the Bible does not address its origins. You have Bibles out there that are obviously theologically wrong. You have not addressed how you identify Biblical correctness.

The Bible is correct because God ordained that God's Church would and did accept it. There may be minor variations in different translations, but I've never come across anything earth shattering. The essence is still there in most major translations. But if you are talking about such things as the Mormon Bible, then it is wrong because God's Church did not accept it.

8,940 posted on 10/13/2007 2:36:51 AM PDT by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8929 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper

The Bible is correct because God ordained that God’s Church would and did accept it. There may be minor variations in different translations, but I’ve never come across anything earth shattering. The essence is still there in most major translations. But if you are talking about such things as the Mormon Bible, then it is wrong because God’s Church did not accept it.


What are the standards that you use to judge the Bible by?


8,960 posted on 10/13/2007 8:36:35 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariae. R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8940 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson