To: Forest Keeper; MarkBsnr; kosta50; P-Marlowe; xzins; Kolokotronis; jo kus
Sure, we can never have conclusive proof about any OTHER manSure, you can. Just ask him.
Then he can ask you.
And then you both have conclusive proof.
7,467 posted on
09/28/2007 2:17:23 AM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: D-fendr; MarkBsnr; kosta50; P-Marlowe; xzins; Kolokotronis; jo kus
FK: "Sure, we can never have conclusive proof about any OTHER man."Sure, you can. Just ask him. Then he can ask you. And then you both have conclusive proof.
I didn't know this was the Latin view, but it makes sense, since in Catholicism a true believer is anyone who claims to be. That is the only view that allows one to lose his salvation.
8,048 posted on
10/03/2007 10:48:11 AM PDT by
Forest Keeper
(It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson