***Relatively few of the Reformed proofs result from the Bible -*** Try reading the Westminster Confession of Faith. Every single line is proofed with selected-to-support-the-Calvinist-Deformed-view Bible text.
***Relatively few of the Reformed proofs result from the Bible - it is mostly from St. Paul’s corrections of straying congregations. ***
Obviously does not consider anything the Bible except the 4 gospels.
Is this post supposed to be "quoting" me with these "***"? If not, then you are deliberately distorting what I wrote in 5715. Or did you just get "too excited" and lost track?
Just in case you can't find your way to my post, this is what I wrote in 5715:
Indeed. Herein lies the rub. Not only do we not even use the same canon, but they don't even treat the Gospels as the prism through which all that was written becomes fully revealed. The Gospels are a living witness of God, not a revelation in a state of trans of some prophet.
P-Marlowe (re: your
5718 reply to irsihtenor's out of context distortion of facts. You didn't even bother to read what I wrote (but don't let the facts get in the way of distorting the truth). You just like to jump to any opportunity to bash Kosta, don't you? My "guilt:" My views of the Bible don't agree with P-Marlowe's. Goodness, what's the verdict? Burning at stake? You are pathetic.
Do you accept every word of the Gospels as being "gospel"?
I do believe there are several statements of Christ which you have said you don't trust as actually being said by Christ.
Isn't that true?