[HarleyD]

You’ve cited to +Iraeneus. Here’s what he said:... No natural immortality there, HD.

Not so my friend. Iraeneus whose reference I cited, even entitles the passage,

"Souls can be recognised in the separate state, and are immortal although they once had a beginning".

It is rather difficult to argue that St. Iraeneus isn't saying souls aren't immortal after they are created. Once again, he also states:

Nevertheless they endure, and extend their existence into a long series of ages in accordance with the will of God their Creator; so that He grants them that they should be thus formed at the beginning, and that they should so exist afterwards.

I think Iraeneus if very clear that once God has created a soul, it exists forever.

Dr. Boyce’s article, at least insofar as he speaks of immortality of the soul, isn’t even remotely in accord with what the Fathers taught,

On the contrary, I find he is in complete alignment with Iraeneus.

[Kolokotronis]

“It is rather difficult to argue that St. Iraeneus isn’t saying souls aren’t immortal after they are created....I think Iraeneus if very clear that once God has created a soul, it exists forever.”

Boy, I don’t see where you reconcile what you and Boyce are saying with what +Iraeneus wrote about immortality being a gift from God to the holy. The souls of the wicked are not immortal. That is denied to them.