Replies

What is perplexing is with such a great disagreement with Christianity on its core belief, why bother with differences on sola scriptura, the Assumption and other, taken in perspective, minor points?

Maybe I am an "Old Christian", one who existed prior to the time the "organization" forced belief in the Trinity as a requirement for Christianity.

Maybe that's why I am a Biblical Unitarian. I do not insist it is necessary for each person to interpret Scripture exactly the same as I do.

You see, in my naivete I believe God has made room for all uf us.

Thanks for your reply.

Maybe I am an "Old Christian", one who existed prior to the time the "organization" forced belief in the Trinity as a requirement for Christianity.

I understand. But the Trinity is still foundational to almost all Protestant and Catholic Christians. I'm just pointing out that your theology is at variance with the foundations of both.

Maybe that's why I am a Biblical Unitarian. I do not insist it is necessary for each person to interpret Scripture exactly the same as I do.

Then I don't get your beef.

You see, in my naivete I believe God has made room for all of us.

Then I really don't get your beef.

Either you're accepting of all interpretations and Christians or you're not. That's what I can't understand. Are you arguing against those who don't accept your view that there should be no set of beliefs? Is that the primary beef? Against any required theology?