Socialism doesn't have to result in economic laziness and ruin, - it would work if everyone desperately wanted it to.
Treating one's neighbor as you would have yourself treated only makes sense if there is something bigger to consider than number one.
I replied:
The premise that a groups "bigger" goal can be gained by treating an unwilling neighbor as a scofflaw makes no sense at all.
Mine was a comparative statement clearly showing that reality cannot be ignored, despite the best of theories.
And clearly, the 'best of theories' include those above about socialism. - Which I countered.
All in correlation to the subject of the thread (religion free morality).
Exactly my point also. -- We have a religion free moral system in place in the USA. It's called our Constitution. Treating one's neighbor as you would have yourself treated [our golden rule] is part of the basic principles of our Constitution and Bill of Rights; namely, - our rights to life, liberty, or property, - shall not be infringed.
Naturally, you've ignored those points about our constitution. Why is that?
Your inability to understand simple posts and their context is not my problem. However, your insistence on advertising your deficiencies is annoying. Or perhaps you are just smarting so badly from the humiliation that you've suffered on numerous threads that you are grasping at anything to pump your ego.You're adding nothing as usual. Go away.
Typical, - instead of engaging on the issue, you make personal remarks in an effort to avoid defending your socialistic agitprop from criticism.
Until then I'm foregoing reading your posts, let alone treating them as if they merit a reply.