Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip; P-Marlowe
"Next Clement of Alexandria indirectly, but I think clearly, confirms the statement. In relating the well-known story of St. John and the robber, he speaks of it as acted out by the apostle on his return from exile in Patmos, 'after the death of the tyrant;' and represents him as at that time an infirm old man.

Here is the story from Clement about the Apostle John with highlights by myself:

Assuming John was 13 (young but not unreasonably so) at the time when Christ began His ministry (30AD), then by 95AD, John would have been 82 years old. If he would have been release from Patmos in 68AD, John would have been 55 years old.

Clements talks about John (after being released from Patmos), blessing a boy, who becomes involved in all sorts of nefarious activities over time. After some amount of time goes by, and John has wandered all around the country sides establishing churches and bishops, they call John back, who then hops a horse and rides across the countryside. Now given the account above, and realizing that there seems to be a substantial amount of time that has past, does the Apostle John’s actions sound like he’s 82 or 55 (realizing that he would be closer to 90)? Does it sound pausible that a 90 year old man (in those days) would hop a horse and ride hard to find a lost soul?

Given this story do you think Clements “represents him [sic: John] as at that time an infirm old man.” as Elliot claims. I don’t think so. Elliot obviously made up this statement to support his own contention. Too bad people didn’t have the Internet back then to check it out.

363 posted on 05/25/2007 12:50:09 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]


To: HarleyD
Does it sound pausible that a 90 year old man (in those days) would hop a horse and ride hard to find a lost soul?

It certainly makes more sense for an old man to need a horse for travel rather than to go on foot. Don't you???

364 posted on 05/25/2007 12:59:23 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; xzins; blue-duncan
Does it sound pausible that a 90 year old man (in those days) would hop a horse and ride hard to find a lost soul?

With God, all things are "pausible".

365 posted on 05/25/2007 1:07:15 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; TomSmedley; topcat54; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; 1000 silverlings; P-Marlowe; Uncle Chip; ...
Given this story do you think Clements "represents him [sic: John] as at that time an infirm old man." as Elliot claims. I don't think so. Elliot obviously made up this statement to support his own contention. Too bad people didn't have the Internet back then to check it out.

Which is why I harp on trying to learn the ramifications of our beliefs -- what is the result of believing this as opposed to that? (Because if we can see outcomes according to our beliefs, you can be sure Satan does, too, and those who conspire with him, knowingly or otherwise, in order to manipulate us and the future.)

So here we have two different dates and thus two different interpretations of the past and then, inevitably, of the future.

Now who wants us fearful and hesitant and uncertain of Christ's earthly as well as spiritual ownership over this planet? Who benefits by telling Christians Christ's victory on the cross results in a world that slides into seclusion, apathy, apostasy and a silencing of the Great Commission?

Obviously, those who are trying to accomplish exactly that benefit by this interpretation of Scripture.

Alternately, who benefits by believing Christ rules today? I just read this short Q & A by R.C. Sproul and it's irrefutable...

Has Satan been given dominion over the earth until Jesus returns? If so, why was he given this authority?

There's only one supreme Lord over all the world, and that's God. We are told in the Old Testament that this whole concept of dominion was shared with Adam and Eve. Man was given dominion over the earth to be vice-regents for God, that is, vice kings to represent God's reign on this planet. Of course, we made a terrible mess out of it, and we were subjected more and more to the power of Satan. That power of Satan was dealt not just a significant blow but a fatal blow by Christ in his incarnation. 

We're told, first of all, that God the Father gives to Jesus all authority in heaven and on earth. In his ascension, Christ is seated at the right hand of God, where he is crowned as the King of kings and the Lord of lords. That was a tremendous blow to all worldly or satanic powers, principalities, and spiritual wickedness in high places. So if you ask me who is in dominion over this world right now, I think the New Testament is perfectly clear on that. The one who is in dominion is the Lord. The Lord God omnipotent reigns, and the Lord Christ reigns over this world right now. His kingdom may not be of this world, but it certainly includes this world, and Jesus has all authority over heaven and earth. 

Even at this moment, as I'm discussing this question, Satan's authority and power are limited and subordinate to the authority that is vested in Christ. Christ right now is the king of this earth. His kingdom is invisible, and not everybody acknowledges it. People are giving more allegiance to the prince of darkness than to the Prince of Peace, but that is an act of usurpation on the part of Satan. His power is restricted, limited, and temporal. What has happened briefly is this: The power and authority of Satan has been dealt a fatal blow by Christ. The Cross, the Incarnation, the Resurrection, and the Ascension tremendously weakened any power or authority that Satan enjoyed, but it didn't annihilate him. That will come later, when Christ completes his work of redemption with the consummation of his kingdom. All things will be brought into captivity to him, and every knee will bow to him, including the fallen angels, who will bow in submission to his authority. 


366 posted on 05/25/2007 1:24:31 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson