DoP,
You assume a lot friend! I did not level a single
criticism against the institution, as you assume
in your post. I simply said that knowing the
institution gives you all you need to know about
the criticism by the author of the article. I stand
by that.
Heck, you even assumed I “sneered”. For the record,
I never sneer. I do smile a lot.
As an aside, I appreciate a high view of scripture,
where ever I find it, including your alma mater.
best,
ampu
you are correct and I am wrong. In re viewing your post, you could have simply been saying that "you know the theological bent simply by knowing the theological heritage of RTS." Since you say that was all you meant, then I accept that, and I humbly apologize.
If that is what you meant, then you are in fact, absolutely correct. Where you start out in these issues largely determines where you will wind up. I hope you will forgive me for misreading your post.