Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86
That's fine but suggesting that the exercise of legitimate papal authority is somehow analogous to nazism is not. BTW, it was Mussolini's Fascist movement and "corporate state" which "made the trains run on time."

I think you need to retract your#54. Don't you?

We don't have to fight but I am not likely to be silent in the face of such defamations of my Church.

97 posted on 05/15/2007 1:17:52 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk; NYer; Canticle_of_Deborah
#54 has already been diluted to nearly the point of homeopathic indivisibility so I’ll leave it at that.

You misinterpreted my remark if you thought I had implied that an exercise of papal authority — for good reason and correctly — is analogous to Nazism, fascism, or even plain bad governance. I didn’t ever mean that and the remark was more an expression of a bad stomachache than anything else so I won’t try to defend it. Sorry, NYer.

I WANT the Pope to vigorously exercise his authority to condemn evil and encourage good. However, as the Blessed Virgin had warned us, meanings of good and evil would invert in the latter part of the 20th century and therefore we had a Pope condemning what is good: Lefebvre seeking to preserve the Tridentine rite and protect it from protestantization and bastardization from the vernacular culture. Until just recently, we also witnessed a remarkable tolerance for evil — in terms of culture of death thinking, among other moral perversions, infiltrating certain well-known “Catholic” politicians, hospital administrators (i.e. death pills), priests in the case of sexual improprieties, and others.

Obviously, the modernism and liberalism of the post-Conciliar Church is what gets up the dander of the trads, including myself, along with an outright contempt at times for that which made the Catholic Mass what it is (or was). An example of the latter that comes to mind are those priests who deny communicants the desire to receive the Host on the tongue while kneeling. This is quite common, and has happened to at least one individual multiple times at different parishes. But if you’ll stand, sir, and receive the Host in the hand from a female Eucharistic minister we’ll be more than happy to oblige. This is outrageous and a desecration of the host.

Membership in the Roman Catholic Church is not a dress-up or costume party or a "come as you are" party.

Actually, I peeked into a Novus Ordo Mass a couple Sundays ago from the vestibule after picking up some kids from Sunday School. The dress of several persons attending the Mass did in fact resemble a (beach) costume party.

while remaining in enmity towards the Church

Far be it from enmity, Archbishop Lefebvre possessed enormous love for the Church and the Mass and tried to prevent their destruction.

98 posted on 05/15/2007 2:40:59 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson