Southern CA just had a Dixieland Mass. I can't wait for the pictures.
We are what you once were.
We believe what you once believed.
We worship as you once worshipped.
If you were right then, we are right now.
If we are wrong now, you were wrong then.
My betting is that B-XVI will ratchet up the frequency of Tridentine Masses whether the diocesan bishops like it or not. In the Roman Catholic Church from which Marcel the Impudent and his little pals were expelled, we expect that the pope will be obeyed by the laity much less by the bishops. That is why Marcel got the boot along with Fellay, Williamson, de Mallerais and the rest. If B-XVI says otherwise, I will obey which makes me consistent. If B-XVI does NOT lift the declaration of schism and gheexcommunications, will you submit in obedience or continue the rebellion you joined when John Paul the Great was pope? That would, at least, make you consistent for a change.
Southern California is no place for a Dixieland Mass. If we simply must inculturate, that Mass belongs in New Orleans. Until you get the oictures, you will just have to wait. AND, what's wrong with Masses on beaches so long as they are ad orientem and Tridentine? I bet they were common all over the South Pacific in World War II.
Anyone driven out of the Church into the schism by my posts was no member of the Church before reading my posts. Catholicism would lose nothing of value.
Maybe Archbishop Gomez can be appointed to replace McPhony and restore Catholicism to Los Angeles. Fabian Bruskewitz (who had the sense to formally excommunicate the schizzies in his diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska) is getting on in years.
Do you think Castrillon de Hoyos has any more infallibility than such as Kaspar or McPhony? If so, why?